Risks without a common structure
We assess capabilities and gaps against NIST CSF 2.0 and organize priorities to improve cybersecurity risk management.
Why this matters
The value is not checking boxes; it is understanding the current state and deciding which actions matter most.
Risks without a common structure
Capabilities and controls that are difficult to compare
Technical priorities disconnected from business
Limited evidence to demonstrate progress
AEGRIX approach
We map the current state against the defined scope and translate gaps into priorities and actions.
Typical deliverables
NIST CSF 2.0 structure
The assessment is organized around cybersecurity outcomes and the organization’s risk context, rather than a generic checklist.
Cybersecurity governance, strategy, policies, roles, risk and expectations.
Understanding assets, risks, processes, dependencies and improvement opportunities.
Safeguards for managing risk, including identity, access, data and platforms.
Capabilities to discover and analyze possible attacks or compromises.
Actions and coordination following detected cybersecurity incidents.
Restoration of affected assets and operations, with lessons used for improvement.
Process
We define objectives, assets, processes and scope.
We review capabilities and practices against the agreed framework.
We identify relevant opportunities and risks.
We build an improvement plan with clear next steps.
Next step
Let’s discuss the scope that makes sense for your organization.
Talk to AEGRIX